Skip to main content

EU AI Act Technical Compliance

The EU AI Act enters phased enforcement through 2025–2027, with the GPAI (general-purpose AI) provisions becoming binding from August 2, 2026. For high-risk AI systems, Articles 11–15 specify concrete technical requirements: technical documentation, record-keeping, transparency, human oversight, and accuracy/robustness. Cronozen’s DPU was designed independently around the same audit demands. This page maps DPU primitives directly to AI Act Articles so compliance teams can see what is already covered and where additional configuration is needed.

Coverage Matrix

Article 12 — Record-Keeping in Detail

Article 12 demands that high-risk AI systems automatically log enough information to “ensure the traceability of the system’s functioning.” The minimum recordable items include:
  • Period of each use
  • Input data reference
  • Persons involved in verification
  • Output produced
DPU captures all of these as fields in the sealed envelope:

Article 14 — Human Oversight

For high-risk AI, Article 14 requires that a human can:
  1. Fully understand the AI system’s capabilities and limitations
  2. Remain aware of automation bias
  3. Correctly interpret outputs
  4. Decide not to use the output or override it
  5. Intervene or interrupt operation
Cronozen’s three decision modes map directly:

Human-in-the-Loop

Required for Art. 14 high-risk decisions. Human approves before action; DPU records the human’s decision and reasoning.

Human-on-the-Loop

Acceptable for moderate-risk decisions with intervention window. DPU records both AI output and any human override.

Autonomous

For low-risk, well-understood decisions only. DPU still captures full audit context for post-hoc review.
Mode selection should be aligned with the system’s risk classification under Art. 6 and the provider’s risk management process (Art. 9).

GPAI (General-Purpose AI) — August 2, 2026

If your system uses a GPAI model (e.g., Claude, GPT, Gemini) as a building block, you have additional obligations from August 2, 2026:
  • Track which GPAI model was used for each decision
  • Maintain references to the GPAI provider’s technical documentation
  • Disclose AI-generated content under Art. 50
Cronozen DPU already stores modelId and modelVersion per decision — enough to satisfy “which model was used” tracing. You are responsible for retaining the GPAI provider’s technical documentation references.

Practical Compliance Workflow

1. Classify your system

Determine risk category under Art. 6. For high-risk, the full Art. 11–15 stack applies.

2. Configure decision modes

Set agent mode (in-loop / on-loop / autonomous) per use case to match Art. 14 requirements.

3. Define policy snapshots

Version your decision policies. DPU snapshots the active version at each decision.

4. Export audit trail

Use GET /api/v1/dpu/export to produce a verifiable bundle for technical documentation (Art. 11).

What Cronozen Does Not Cover

DPU is a technical proof layer. It does not replace:
  • Risk management process (Art. 9) — a documented organizational process is still required
  • Data quality (Art. 10) — your training/operational data must meet quality requirements
  • Conformity assessment (Art. 43) — third-party assessment for certain high-risk systems
  • Post-market monitoring (Art. 72) — your operational reporting obligation
Cronozen produces the evidence that supports these processes. The processes themselves remain your responsibility.

See Also